Is Friedrich Merz the Leader Germany Needs?

CDU’s Identity Crisis in the Age of Personalization

No.1(2026)

Abstract

This study investigates how a traditional political party, the German CDU, responds to the increasing public demand for charismatic leadership. By analyzing the leadership of Friedrich Merz through the framework of plebiscitary leader democracy, the research highlights how the CDU navigates the balance between intra-party authority and broader electoral appeal. This qualitative study seeks to explore the perceptions, ideas, and priorities of key party politics stakeholders. The chosen method is a semi-structured interview. The findings reveal that Merz has successfully positioned himself within the party by excelling in the four competition values of plebiscitary leader democracy: meritocracy, peaceful conflict resolution, integration, and repoliticization. His election through the CDU’s first-ever all-member vote marks a departure from previous elite-driven selection processes, granting him a strong internal mandate. However, the study also underscores the challenge of translating intra-party dominance into national electoral success.


Keywords:
leader democracy, leader selection, qualities of leader, personal brand, German CDU, Friedrich Merz
References

Aaker, J. L. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research 34(3), pp. 347–356.

Aberbach, J. & Rockman, B. A. (2002). Conducting and coding elite interviews. Political Science & Politics 35(4), pp. 673–676.

Balmas, M. & Sheafer, T. (2013). Leaders first, countries after: Mediated political personalization in the international arena. Journal of communication 63(3), pp. 454–475.

Bobba, G. (2011). Media e politica in Italia e Francia. Due democrazie del pubblico a confronto. Milano: FrancoAngeli.

Bobba, G., & Seddone, A. (2011). Personal and personalized party: Notes on a theoretical framework. In 61st Political Studies Association Annual Conference, London, UK, 19–21 April 2011 (pp. 1–15).

Bryman. A. (2012). Social Research Methods. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

Bundestagswahl. (2025). Wem trauen Wählende gute Lösungen zu? Tagensscahu.de. https://www.tagesschau.de/wahl/archiv/2025-02-23-BT-DE/umfrage-kompetenzen.shtml

Caiani, M., Padoan, E. & Marino, B. (2021) Candidate selection, personalization and different logics of centralization in new southern European populism: the cases of podemos and the M5S. Government and Opposition 57(3), pp. 1−24.

Castells, M. (2018). Rupture: The crisis of liberal democracy. John Wiley & Sons.

Chambers, M. (2021, July 25). Laughing in flood town was stupid, says Germany's Laschet as gaffe hits ratings. Reuters.com. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/laughing-flood-town-was-stupid-says-germanys-laschet-gaffe-hits-ratings-2021-07-25/

Calise, M. (2000). Il partito personale. Roma-Bari: Laterza.

Calise, M. (2005). Presidentialization, Italian Style. In Poguntke T. & Webb P. (Eds.), The Presidentialization of Politics. A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chiru, M., Gauja, A., Gherghina, S. & Rodríguez-Teruel, J. (2015). Explaining change in party leadership selection rules. In Cross W. P. & Pilet J. B. (Eds.), The politics of party leadership: A cross-national perspective. Oxford University Press.

Cianetti, L. & Hanley, S. (2021). The end of the backsliding paradigm. Journal of Democracy 32(1), pp. 66–80.

Cross, W. P. & Pilet, J. B. (2015). Uncovering the Politics of Party Leadership. In: Cross W. P. & Pilet J. B. (Eds.), The politics of party leadership: A cross-national perspective. Oxford University Press.

Dalton, R. J. & Wattenberg, M. P. (2000). Unthinkable Democracy: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. In: Dalton R. J. & Wattenberg M. P. (Eds.), Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. New York: Oxford University Press.

Declercq, E., Hurley, T. L. & Luttbeg, N. R. (1975). Voting in American Presidential Elections, 1956-1972. American Politics Quarterly 3, pp. 222–246.

Deutsche Welle. (2025, March 14). CDU/CSU, SPD, Grüne: Milliarden-Paket für Deutschland steht. https://www.dw.com/de/cdu-csu-spd-gr%C3%BCne-milliarden-paket-f%C3%BCr-deutschland-steht/a-71925484

Eatwell, R. & Goodwin, M. (2018). National populism: The revolt against liberal democracy. Pelican.

EPP Group in the European Parliament. EPPGroup.eu. https://www.eppgroup.eu/who-we-are/how-we-work (accessed October 2, 2025).

Freire, A. & Tsatsanis, E. (2015). Party families, ideological distinctiveness and cohesion: A strong test of the heuristics of the concept of “familles spirituelles”. In ECPR General Conference, Montreal, Canada, 26–29 August 2015.

Galston, W.A. (2020). Anti-pluralism: The populist threat to liberal democracy. Yale University Press.

Garzia, D. (2011). The Personalization of Politics in Western Democracies: Causes and Consequences on Leader-Follower Relationships. Leadership Quarterly 22(4), pp. 697–709.

Gjipali, D. (2021). The status quo of modern democracy. In Fourteenth international conference on: “social and natural sciences – global challenge 2021”, Paris, France, 18 April 2021.

Goldstein, K. (2002). Getting in the door: Sampling and completing elite interviews. Political Science & Politics 35(4), pp. 669–672.

Green, J. E. (2016). The shadow of unfairness: a plebeian theory of liberal democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Greive, M. & Olk, J. (2025, March 15). Wie es zum großen Kompromiss zwischen Union, SPD und Grünen kam, Handelsblatt. https://www.handelsblatt.com/politik/deutschland/schulden-wie-es-zum-grossen-kompromiss-zwischen-union-spd-und-gruenen-kam/100113850.html

Guja, A., Pich, C., & Spry, L. (2019). Exploring the creation and development of political co-brand identity: A multi-case study approach. Qualitative Market Research 22(5), pp. 716–744.

Guzmán, F., & Sierra, V. (2009). A political candidate's brand image scale: Are political candidates brands? Journal of Brand Management 17, pp. 207–217.

Hayes, D. (2005). Candidate qualities through a partisan lens: A theory of trait ownership. American Journal of Political Science 49(4), pp. 908–923.

Hazan, R., & Rahat, G. (2010). Democracy within Parties: Candidate Selection Methods and Their Political Consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://academic.oup.com/book/34418

Held, D. (2006). Models of democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press and Polity Press.

Heckmann, D. O. (2022). Friedrich Merz - Portrait über Stärken und Schwächen des CDU-Chefs. Deutschlandfunk. https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/portrait-ueber-staerken-und-schwaechen-des-cdu-chefs-100.html

Henkel, S. (2024). Merz’ Selbstbewusstsein dürfte beim CDU-Parteitag gewachsen sein. tagesschau.de. https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/innenpolitik/cdu-parteitag-270.html

Hennecke, H. J. (2024). Friedrich Merz – Geschichte der CDU. KAS.de. https://www.kas.de/de/web/geschichte-der-cdu/personen/biogramm-detail/-/content/friedrich-merz-2

Herrmann, B., & Koopmann, C. (2022). CDU führt Frauenquoteein. Süddeutsche.de. https://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/cdu-parteitag-frauenquote-merz-1.5654657

Höhne, B. (2021). How Democracy Works within a Populist Party: Candidate Selection in the Alternative for Germany. Government and Opposition 58(3), pp. 478–496.

Holloway, T. M., & Hendrie, C. A. (2023). Follow the Leader: Examining the Use of Heuristics in Political Social Media Advertising During the 2019 UK General Election. Journal of Political Marketing, pp. 1–21.

Hughes, A. (2007). Personal brands: An exploratory analysis of personal brands in Australian political marketing. In M. Thyne, K. Deans, & J. Gnoth (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2007 Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference: Reputation, Responsibility, Relevance (pp. 1114–1120). University of Otago

Hughes, A., & Dann, S. (2009). Political marketing and stakeholder engagement. Marketing Theory 9(2), pp. 243–256.

Hughes, A., Dann, S., & Neale, L. (2008). Exploring the Application of Personal Brands and Opinion Leadership in Political Marketing. In: Proceedings of Australia and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference 2008, Marketing: Shifting Focus from the Mainstream to Offbeat, Promaco Conventions Pty Ltd, Australia.

Illés, G., & Körösényi, A. (2022). From the theater to the hippodrome: A critique of Jeffrey Green’s theory of plebiscitary democracy and an alternative. Contemporary Political Theory 21(3), 419–442.

Kain, F. (2024). Immer beliebter!: Darum ist Friedrich Merz plötzlich so stark. bild.de. https://www.bild.de/politik/inland/politik-inland/immer-beliebter-darum-ist-friedrich-merz-ploetzlich-so-stark-86958036.bild.html

Kane, J., & Patapan, H. (2012). The democratic leader: How democracy defines, empowers and limits its leaders. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kaneva, N., & Klemmer, A. (2016). The rise of brandidates? A cultural perspective on political candidate brands in postmodern consumer democracies. Journal of Customer Behaviour 15(3), 299–313.

Karvonen, L. (2009). The Personalisation of Politics: A Study of Parliamentary Democracies. Colchester: ECPR Press.

Kenig, O., Rahat, G. & Hazan, R. (2015). Leadership selection versus candidate selection: similarities and differences. In Sandri G, Seddone A, Venturino F (Eds.), Party Primaries in Comparative Perspective. Farnham: Routledge, pp. 21–39.

Körösényi, A. (2007). Political leadership: between guardianship and classical democracy. In: ECPR Workshop on ‘Political Leadership: A Missing Element in Democratic Theory’ (pp. 7–12). Helsinki, Finland, 7-12 May 2007.

Krasteva, A. (2019). Post-democratic Crisis and Political Leadership. From Crisis Management to Crisis Creation. In Salvatore S et al. (Eds.), Culture in Policy Making: The Symbolic Universes of Social Action. New York: Springer.

Lasswell, H. (1930). Psychopathology and Politics. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

Lees-Marshment, J. (2020). Political management: The dance of government and politics. London: Routledge.

Mair, P., & van Biezen, I. (2001). Party Membership in Twenty European Democracies, 1980-2000. Party Politics 7(1), pp. 5–21.

Marino, B., Martocchia Diodati, N. & Verzichelli, L. (2022). The personalization of party politics in Western Europe (1985–2016): evidence from an expert survey. Acta Politica, 57(3), pp. 571–596.

Marx, S. & Laschet, A. (2024). Geschichte der CDU. KAS.de. https://www.kas.de/de/web/geschichte-der-cdu/personen/biogramm-detail/-/content/armin-laschet-v1

Mechkova, V., Luhrmann, A., & Lindberg. S.I. (2017). How much democratic backsliding? Journal of Democracy 28(4), 162–169.

Mendgen, A. (2023). CDU-Grundsatzprogramm: Steuern, Rente, Atomkraft – was steht im ersten Entwurf? RND.de. https://www.rnd.de/politik/cdu-grundsatzprogramm-steuern-rente-atomkraft-was-steht-im-ersten-entwurf-PZ3LT55WQNH3HG6GMP737TS3SM.html

Mendgen, A. (2024). K-Frage der Union: Was Merz, Söder und Wüst zwischen den Zeilen sagen – eine Analyse. RND.de. https://www.rnd.de/politik/k-frage-der-union-was-merz-soeder-und-wuest-zwischen-den-zeilen-sagen-eine-analyse-JXCTFZD5AFCHBAYIE3DQMLSVLE.html

Merz. F. [@merzcdu]. (2024, January 22). Interview excerpt in which he states that his personal strength is “motivating and leading a team” in a successful manner that “cannot be achieved by authority alone” [Video]. Instagram.

Mounk, Y. (2018). The people vs. democracy: Why our freedomis in danger and how to save it. Harvard University Press.

Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge University Press.

Neu, V. (2017). „Ich wollte etwas bewegen.“ Die Mitglieder der CDU: Eine empirische Analyse von Mitgliedern, Wählern und der Bevölkerung. Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V.

Omojola, O. (2008). Audience Mindset and Influence on Personal Political Branding. Journal of Social Science 16(2), pp. 127–134.

Pakulski, J., & Higley, J. (2008). Towards leader democracy. In P. ‘t Hart & J Uhr (Eds.), Public leadership: Perspectives and practices. The Australian National University: E Press.

Pancer, S. M., Brown, S. D. & Barr, C. W. (1999). Forming Impressions of Political Leaders: A Cross-National Comparison. Political Psychology 20(2), pp. 345–368.

Panebianco, A. (1982). Modelli di partito. Bologna: Il Mulino.

Pilet, J. B., van Haute, E., & Kelbel, E. (2015). Candidate Selection Procedures for the European Elections. Brussels: European Parliament’s Committee on Constitutional Affairs.

Pich, C., Armannsdottir, G., & Dean, D. (2020). Exploring the process of creating and managing personal political brand identities in nonparty environments: The case of the Bailiwick of Guernsey. Journal of Political Marketing 19(4), pp. 414–434.

Rahat, G., & Sheafer, T. (2007) The personalization(s) of politics: Israel 1949-2003. Political Communication 24, 65–80.

Regenstrei, P. (1965) The Diefenbaker Interlude: Parties and Voting in Canada. Toronto, ON, Canada: Longman.

Saelens, E. (2019). The party is over: political branding makes way for the personal. In: The Drum. https://www.thedrum.com/opinion/2019/03/05/the-party-over-political-branding-makes-way-the-personal

Schumpeter, J. (1987). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Unwin.

Scott, A. (2018). (Plebiscitary) leader democracy: The return of an illusion? Thesis Eleven 148(1), pp. 3–20.

Shavit, A., & Konrádová, M. (2025). The challenge for political personal branding - The democratic leader paradox. International Journal of Market Research, 67(2-3), 282–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/14707853251314658

Skovajsa, M. (2019). Vůdcovská demokracie podle Maxe Webera a její ohlasy v české sociologii. In M. Hanyš & T. W. Pavlíček (Eds.), Dějiny, smysl a modernita: k 75. narozeninám Miloše Havelky. Praha: Masarykův ústav a Archiv Akademie věd ČR, Univerzita Karlova, Fakulta humanitních studií.

Smith G (2009) Conceptualizing and testing brand personality in British politics. Journal of Political Marketing 8(3), pp. 209–232.

Somer-Topcu, Z. (2017). Agree or disagree: How do party leader changes affect the distribution of voters’ perceptions. Party Politics 23(1), pp. 66–75.

The Federal Returning Officer. (2025). Bundestag election 2025. https://www.bundeswahlleiterin.de/en/bundestagswahlen/2025.html

Valgarðsson, V. O., Clarke, N., Jennings, W., & Stoker, G. (2020). The Good Politician and Political Trust: An Authenticity Gap in British Politics? Political Studies, 69(4), 858–880. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321720928257

Vandeleene, A., & van Haute, E. (2021). A comparative analysis of selection criteria of candidates in Belgium. Frontiers in Political Science 3, 1–13.

Voženílková, M. (2018). Personalizace politiky v České republice. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.

Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretative Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Weber, M. (2005). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Die Wirtschaft und die gesellschaftlichen Ordnungen und Mächte. Nachlaß. Teilband 4: Herrschaft (E. Hanke, Ed.; T. Kroll, in collaboration). Mohr Siebeck.

Weinberg, J. (2022). Can Political Trust Help to Explain Elite Policy Support and Public Behaviour in Times of Crisis? Evidence from the United Kingdom at the Height of the 2020 Coronavirus Pandemic. Political Studies 70(3), pp. 655–679.

Zehender, K. (2024). Annegret Kramp-Karrenbaue – Geschichte der CDU. KAS.de. https://www.kas.de/de/web/geschichte-der-cdu/personen/biogramm-detail/-/content/annegret-kramp-karrenbauer-v1

Zielonka, J. (2018). Counter-revolution: Liberal Europe in retreat. Oxford University Press.

Žižlavský, M. (2012). Strana jako značka. In R Chytilek, O. Eibl, A. Matušková. Teorie a metody politického marketingu. Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury.

Žižlavský, M., & Eibl, O. (2011). Srovnání osobností politických značek ČSSD, ODS a lídrů těchto stran. Sociální studia 8(3), pp. 65–95.

Interviews:

‘Party Supporter 1’. Interview by Martina Beránková [MS Teams], 4 June, 2024.

‘Party Supporter 2’. Interview by Martina Beránková [MS Teams], 5 June, 2024.

‘Party Member 2’. Interview by Martina Beránková [MS Teams], 10 June, 2024.

‘Party Member 3’. Interview by Martina Beránková [MS Teams], 11 June, 2024.

‘Party Member 1’. Interview by Martina Beránková [MS Teams], 14 June, 2024.

‘Party Member 4’. Interview by Martina Beránková [MS Teams], 17 June, 2024.

‘Party Elite 1’. Interview by Martina Beránková [MS Teams], 24 June, 2024.

‘Party Elite 2’. Interview by Martina Beránková [MS Teams], 10 July, 2024.

Metrics

0

Crossref logo

0


0

Views

0

PDF views