Post hoc Theorising in Rational Choice Research on Voting: Revisiting an Old Debate

Aldrich, J. H. (1997). When is it rational to vote? In D. C. Mueller (Ed.), Perspectives on Public Choice: A Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Batterman, R. W. (2009). Idealization and modeling. Synthese, 169(3), 427–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9436-1

Blais, A. (2000). To Vote or Not to Vote: The Merits and Limits of Rational Choice Theory. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Blais, A., & Achen, C. H. (2019). Civic duty and voter turnout. Political Behavior, 41(2), 473–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9459-3

Brzechczyn, K. (2019). Modele w nauce [Models in science]. In S. Janeczek, M. Walczak, & A. Starościc (Eds), Metodologia nauk. Cz. I: Czym jest nauka? [Methodology of Science. Part I: What is Science?] (pp. 205–230). Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.

Bunge, M. (1995). Rational choice theory: A critical look at its foundations. In J. Götschl (Ed.), Revolutionary Changes in Understanding Man and Society: Scopes and Limits (pp. 211–227). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

Çakır, S. (2022). Does party ambivalence decrease voter turnout? A global analysis. Party Politics, 28(4), 713–726. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688211002486

Cartwright, N. (1983). How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cassini, A. (2021). Deidealized models. In A. Cassini & J. Redmond (Eds), Models and Idealizations in Science: Artifactual and Fictional Approaches (pp. 87–113). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Chong, D. (1996). Rational choice theory’s mysterious rivals. In J. Friedman (Ed.), The Rational Choice Controversy: Economic Models of Politics Reconsidered (pp. 37–57). New Haven/London: Yale University Press.

Dalton, R. J. (2008). The quantity and the quality of party systems: Party system polarization, its measurement, and its consequences. Comparative Political Studies, 41(7), 899–920. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414008315860

Diermeier, D. (1996). Rational choice and the role of theory in political science. In J. Friedman (Ed.), The Rational Choice Controversy: Economic Models of Politics Reconsidered (pp. 59–70). New Haven/London: Yale University Press.

Dowding, K. (2005). Is it rational to vote? Five types of answer and a suggestion. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 7(3), 442–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2005.00188.x

Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.

Dzionek-Kozłowska, J. (2018). Model homo oeconomicus. Geneza, ewolucja, wpływ na rzeczywistość gospodarczą [The Homo Oeconomicus Model: Genesis, Evolution, and Influence on Economic Reality]. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.

Edlin, A., Gelman, A., & Kaplan, N. (2007). Voting as a rational choice: Why and how people vote to improve the well-being of others. Rationality and Society, 19(3), 293–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463107077384

Feddersen, T., & Sandroni, A. (2006). A theory of participation in elections. The American Economic Review, 96(4), 1271–1282.

Fiorina, M. P. (1990). Information and rationality in elections. In J. A. Frejehon & J. H. Kuklinski (Eds), Information and Democratic Processes (pp. 329–342). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

Geys, B. (2006). ‘Rational’ theories of voter turnout: A review. Political Studies Review, 4(1), 16–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9299.2006.00034.x

Gibbard, A., & Varian, H. R. (1978). Economic models. The Journal of Philosophy, 75(11), 664–677. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil1978751111

Godfrey-Smith, P. (2009). Abstractions, idealizations, and evolutionary biology. In A. Barberousse, M. Morange, & T. Pradeu (Eds), Mapping the Future of Biology (pp. 47–56). Dordrecht: Springer.

Goldfarb, R. S., & Sigelman, L. (2010). Does ‘civic duty’ ‘solve’ the rational choice voter turnout puzzle? Journal of Theoretical Politics, 22(3), 275–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951629810365798

Green, D. P., & Shapiro, I. (1994). Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Green, D. P., & Shapiro, I. (1996). Pathologies revisited: Reflections on our critics. In J. Friedman (Ed.), The Rational Choice Controversy: Economic Models of Politics Reconsidered (pp. 235–276). New Haven/London: Yale University Press.

Herfeld, C., & Marx, J. (2023). Rational choice explanations in political science. In H. Kincaid & J. van Bouwel (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Political Science (pp. 54–85). New York: Oxford University Press.

Hobolt, S. B., & Hoerner, J. M. (2020). The mobilising effect of political choice. European Journal of Political Research, 59(2), 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12353

Hug, S. (2014). Further twenty years of pathologies? Is rational choice better than it used to be? Swiss Political Science Review, 20(3), 486–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12123

Jankowski, R. (2015). Altruism and Self-Interest in Democracies: Individual Participation in Government. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Johnson, J. (1996). How not to criticize rational choice theory: Pathologies of ‘common sense’. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 26(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/004839319602600104

Jones, M. R. (2005). Idealization and abstraction: A framework. In M. R. Jones & N. Cartwright (Eds), Idealization XII: Correcting the Model: Idealization and Abstraction in the Sciences (pp. 173–217). Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.

Knuuttila, T., & Morgan, M. S. (2019). Deidealization: No easy reversals. Philosophy of Science, 86(4), 641–661. https://doi.org/10.1086/704975

Kriesi, H. (2005). Economics and politics: Towards a dialogue between economics and political science. Swiss Political Science Review, 11(4), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1662-6370.2005.tb00378.x

Lehtinen, A., & Kuorikoski, J. (2007). Unrealistic assumptions in rational choice theory. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 37(2), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393107299684

Levins, R. (1966). The strategy of model building in population biology. American Scientist, 54(4), 421–431.

Loewen, P. J. (2010). Affinity, antipathy and political participation: How our concern for others makes us vote. Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue Canadienne de Science Politique, 43(3), 661–687.

Lovett, F. (2006). Rational choice theory and explanation. Rationality and Society, 18(2), 237–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463106060155

Mäki, U. (1994). Isolation, idealization and truth in economics. In B. Hamminga & N. B. De Marchi (Eds), Idealization VI: Idealization in Economics (pp. 147–168). Amsterdam/Atlanta: Rodopi.

Matsusaka, J. G. (1993). Election closeness and voter turnout: Evidence from California ballot propositions. Public Choice, 76(4), 313–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01053302

McMullin, E. (1985). Galilean idealization. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 16(3), 247–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-3681(85)90003-2

Morgan, M. S. (2006). Economic man as model man: Ideal types, idealization and caricatures. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 28(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10427710500509763

Mueller, D. C. (2003). Public Choice III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nowak, L. (1977). Wstęp do idealizacyjnej teorii nauki [An Introduction to the Idealizational Theory of Science]. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.

Nowak, L. (1980). The Structure of Idealization: Towards a Systematic Interpretation of the Marxian Idea of Science. Dordrecht: Reidel.

Nowak, L. (1990). Abstracts are not our constructs. The mental constructs are abstracts. In J. Brzeziński, F. Coniglione, T. A. F. Kuipers, & L. Nowak (Eds), Idealization I: General Problems (pp. 193–206). Amsterdam/Atlanta: Rodopi.

Nowak, L. (2000a). Galileo-Newton’s model of free fall. In I. Nowakowa & L. Nowak (Eds), Idealization X: The Richness of Idealization (pp. 17–62). Amsterdam/Atlanta: Rodopi.

Nowak, L. (2000b). The idealizational approach to science: A new survey. In I. Nowakowa & L. Nowak (Eds), Idealization X: The Richness of Idealization (pp. 109–184). Amsterdam/Atlanta: Rodopi.

Owen, G., & Grofman, B. (1984). To vote or not to vote: The paradox of nonvoting. Public Choice, 42(3), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00124949

Peruzzi, E., & Cevolani, G. (2022). Defending de-idealization in economic modeling: A case study. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 52(1–2), 25–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/00483931211049759

Potochnik, A. (2017). Idealization and the Aims of Science. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Quack, A. (2024). How narratives can deidealize models. Philosophy of Science, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2024.64

Reiss, J. (2012). Idealization and the aims of economics: Three cheers for instrumentalism. Economics and Philosophy, 28(3), 363–383. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267112000284

Rice, C. (2019). Models don’t decompose that way: A holistic view of idealized models. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 70(1), 179–208. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axx045

Riker, W. H., & Ordeshook, P. C. (1968). A theory of the calculus of voting. American Political Science Review, 62(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/1953324

Rohwer, Y., & Rice, C. (2013). Hypothetical pattern idealization and explanatory models. Philosophy of Science, 80(3), 334–355. https://doi.org/10.1086/671399

Shech, E. (2022). Scientific understanding in the Aharonov-Bohm effect. Theoria, 88(5), 943–971. https://doi.org/10.1111/theo.12409

Shech, E., & Gelfert, A. (2019). The exploratory role of idealizations and limiting cases in models. Studia Metodologiczne, (39), 195–232. https://doi.org/10.14746/sm.2019.39.8

Smets, K., & van Ham, C. (2013). The embarrassment of riches? A meta-analysis of individual-level research on voter turnout. Electoral Studies, 32(2), 344–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2012.12.006

Strevens, M. (2019). The structure of asymptotic idealization. Synthese, 196(5), 1713–1731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1646-y

Such, J. (1973). Idealizacja i konkretyzacja w naukach przyrodniczych [Idealization and concretization in the natural sciences]. In J. Kmita (Ed.), Elementy marksistowskiej metodologii humanistyki [Elements of the Marxist Methodology of the Humanities] (Wydawnictwo Poznańskie, pp. 138–167). Poznań.

Tullock, G. (1967). Toward a Mathematics of Politics. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Turchin, P. (2023). Elites, Counter-Elites and the Path of Political Disintegration. New York: Penguin Books.

von Beyme, K. (2006). Die politischen Theorien der Gegenwart. Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

Weisberg, M. (2015). Simulation and Similarity: Using Models to Understand the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wilkin, J. (2012). Teoria wyboru publicznego—Homo oeconomicus w sferze polityki [Public choice theory: Homo oeconomicus in the political sphere]. In J. Wilkin (Ed.), Teoria wyboru publicznego. Główne nurty i zastosowania [Public Choice Theory: Main Currents and Applications] (pp. 9–30). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe SCHOLAR.

Wimsatt, W. C. (2007). Re-Engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings: Piecewise Approximations to Reality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.